The past few decades, research has seen a massive expansion to the virtual world. Online discussion boards, co-creative activities, and various other methodologies have emerged as fruitful ways to gather insights, all while participants sit comfy and cozy behind a screen. As we’ve mentioned before, research in the virtual space has endless benefits, but also presents new challenges. Non-verbal long format and interactive research activities come with their own challenges, especially in our era of internet slang and shorthand.

Written articulation is most important when there’s little to no verbal component of your research design. The significance depends on where you’re relying most to find your insights. If you’re conducting one on one interviews or focus groups, a participant’s ability to write down their thoughts is likely not as relevant. Every person has their preferred method of communication, and many people excel at verbal expression but fall short when it comes to putting their pen to paper. This isn’t to say that including a short open end in your screener or questionnaire isn’t necessary, but we’ll touch more on this later.

Checking a respondent’s ability to thoroughly write or type out their thoughts is most critical when your research consists of such. Are you hosting a Community on Recollective where you’ll encourage everyone to interact with one another in forum style chats? Is this a live session where participants are typing out responses and thoughts in real time? How about a diary study, where you’re wanting candidates to track their day-to-day habits and perceptions? If your data depends on the participant’s ability to relay the bulk of their information from a pen or keyboard - then you’ll most definitely want to build in written articulation questions in your recruitment process.

These questions can take many forms, depending on your goal in the recruitment process. As I mentioned previously, even if the research isn’t based in text response collection, you can still use written articulation questions to get a sense of the respondent's creativity. Creativity questions serve you best when they’re fun and unrelated to the topic of the research. Below are a few of my personal favorites:

Describe your dream vacation. Where are you, who are you with, and what are you doing?
If you could have dinner with one famous person (living or deceased) who would it be and why?
Tell us about one of your personal hobbies. What is it, how did you discover it, and what value does it bring to your life?

Switching gears to a fun subject is often a great way to observe someone’s enthusiasm and ability to provide an adequate description, although it may not give us much insight into their knowledge or experience of the specific research topic. Creativity questions are also great if you're planning to build any brainstorming or concept creation tasks into your research.

Taking this a step further, written articulation questions can also be used as an extra layer of verification. Are you looking for bioengineers in the US? How about individuals who live in Columbus, OH and frequently dine at Mikey’s Late Night slice? Does your research need insights from individuals that recently submitted an Insurance claim through a specific carrier, such as Allstate or Geico? If your research audience is niche, this is highly encouraged, as quality candidates in your target audience would be able to write about these experiences or products with depth. You’ll quickly note that respondents giving one sentence answers, completely broken grammar, or sporadic and irrelevant answers more than likely are not the individuals that will fuel your insights needs. Written and non-verbal research requires candidates with a strong knack for transposing their thoughts to paper (or a Word document/research platform in our case!) The downside to asking specific written response questions during the recruitment phase is that it’s nearly impossible to probe for knowledge on a subject without giving away the topic. If keeping your research category and motives hidden from the participants is a top priority, this could present some challenges in terms of validation.

In conclusion - your research design should ultimately guide what types of written articulation questions you build into your recruitment process. These prompts can serve a variety of goals and also provide a “sneak peek” into the participants that will be guiding your insights.

Some helpful tips when crafting your written articulation prompts:

Enforce a minimum word count of around 50-150 words, depending on the aim of the question. If an applicant isn’t able to meet a minimum requirement up front, they likely may not be able to contribute an abundant amount of responses in your community, diary study, etc.
Don’t overbear your respondents with multiple open end prompts. While quality assurance and relevance is the key to productive research, it’s still important to avoid fatigue and create a desirable respondent experience.
Make your questions open-ended and give room for respondents to elaborate, and avoid leading their answers.
Whether you're gauging creativity and articulation or looking for an additional level of validation - try to have fun with probing respondents! People value their time and are far more likely to commit to tasks when they find it interesting!

‍

Sources: APM Research Lab

‍

Features:
— Expert analysis provides detailed understanding of the beneficiaries you serve, your peers in the non-profit sector, your generous donors, and more.
— Eagerness to partner with causes of all scopes and sizes, from international charities to individual teams.
— Services offered pro bono or at cost for qualifying entrants, furthering the social impact of your cause.

Projects:
— Partnering with scholars across the academic landscape, we’re efforting to humanize the transgender population by understanding how they score on normal variables of personality and gender-stereotyped behavior. This large-scale quantitative project focuses on and engages with the transgender community as people, rather than as a clinical, pathologized population. Uniting academics from Loyola Marymount University, Northeastern University, and University of Rhode Island, this work aims to add to the incomplete body of scholarship on transgender people.
— Working alongside Lindz Amer and Queer Kid Stuff, we’ve conducted a multi-part brand awareness study to establish awareness of the brand and Amer’s new book Rainbow Parenting. In over twenty in-depth interviews and a rigorous quantitative survey phase, we’ve uncovered valuable insights into opportunities for customer engagement and opportunities to bolster customer financial support.
— Supporting HoMie, an Australian-based charity tackling youth homelessness, by testing innovative software from Research Goat. By conducting in-depth interviews via a variety of methods, we’ll unearth crucial insights about the customer experience at HoMie, and follow up with a large-scale quantitative survey to understand the charity’s reach.
— Assisting Hands on Tokyo as they endeavor to address disability rights and environmental issues in Japan. In response to one of Hands on Tokyo’s inspiring live events, we delivered a video reel and additional content, both featuring enhanced accessibility for Japanese and English speakers.